Buy on Amazon
$40.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $40.99 vs $225.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-10900F - $0.06 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Valorant than Pentium G645 - 807 vs 685 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
685
84.88228004956629%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$40.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Pentium G645 Dual-Core Processor 2.9 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623G645
Buy for $40.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
807
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
21.428571428571423%
Price, $
$225
18%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G645
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Single-Core
465
27.744630071599047%
Multi-Core
800
9.494422027059104%
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
