Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $149.99 vs $225.0
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $1.04 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 36% better in War Thunder than Pentium G4620 - 196 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 20 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
144
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13734 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |