Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3420 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3420 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3420.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $21.1 vs $179.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600K - $0.15 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 52% better in Dirt 5 than Pentium G3420 - 220 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3420 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
145
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$21.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $21.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8153 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
18%
Price, $
$179.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3420 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |