Buy on Amazon
$51.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 637 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than Core i3-3240T - 697 vs 683 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Pentium G3258 - $25.7 vs $51.36
- Up to 43% better value when playing Valorant than Pentium G3258 - $0.04 vs $0.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
683
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3258 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
