Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than Pentium G3220T - 190 vs 141 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |