Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2433 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G3220 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium G3220
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
