Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium G3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1675 days newer than Pentium G3220.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G3220 - 112 vs 111 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |