Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G2130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G2130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2656 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G2130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2130
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $43.64 vs $225.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900F - $0.28 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 56% better in F1 23 than Pentium G2130 - 240 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2130 - 20 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
FPS
154
64%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$43.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $43.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 971 minutes ago
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 972 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2130 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |