Buy on Amazon
$250
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-7600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than Core i5-7600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-7600T - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-7600T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
