Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8120 - 244 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $78.02 vs $225.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-10900F - $0.38 vs $0.91 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
41.75824175824176%
Price, $
$225
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
203
83.19672131147541%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |