Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G2020T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1620 days newer than Pentium G2020T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2020T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 192% better in League of Legends than Pentium G2020T - 140 vs 48 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2020T - 64 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G2020T
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2020T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
