Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium G2010 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1620 days newer than Pentium G2010.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G2010
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Pentium G2010 - 264 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G2010 - 64 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G2010
Desktop • Jan 21st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G2010 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 21st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
