Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Pentium 987 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1609 days newer than Pentium 987.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 987
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium 987 - 172 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 987 - 64 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium 987
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 987 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
