Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Core M-5Y51 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 2626 days newer than Core M-5Y51.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y51
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 35% better in World of Warcraft than Core M-5Y51 - 218 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y51 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core M-5Y51
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Core i9-12900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y51 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core M | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
