Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 11% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than EPYC 7551P - 197 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900 - 64 vs 24 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$458
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8034 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
Alder Lake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 32 |
24 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |