Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1916 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Monster Hunter: World than EPYC 7551P - 285 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$469.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 24 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |