Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 54% better in Starfield than EPYC 7551P - 77 vs 50 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |