Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 976 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 4 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core M-5Y10c - 123 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 64 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core M-5Y10c
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core M | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
| 0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 8.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
