Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 3200G - 202 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 28 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $81.39 vs $970.7
- Up to 91% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-9940X - $0.42 vs $4.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $970.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
196
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |