Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-6700T - 217 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 28 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $89.08 vs $998.95
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $998.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76888 minutes ago
Buy for $89.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
81.08293351610692%
Multi-Core
3566
33.22153903484256%
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
28 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |