Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $59.4 vs $556.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $556 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75680 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75680 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
79.3010752688172%
Multi-Core
5480
57.58722152164775%
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |