Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2561 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 20% better in Far Cry 5 than FX-8320 - 220 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |