Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2397 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 52% better in New World than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 167 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $81.79 vs $589.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900KS - $0.74 vs $3.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.53/FPS
20%
Price, $
$589.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
110
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |