Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 1285 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 289 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $69.82 vs $575.0
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75388 minutes ago
Buy for $69.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75390 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
33.88083735909822%
Multi-Core
3013
13.800210690239545%
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |