Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2751 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 14% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-6400 - 289 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $71.45 vs $589.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-13900KS - $0.28 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
13%
Price, $
$589.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $589.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
254
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$71.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $71.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |