Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 2948 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-5820K - 766 vs 528 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5820K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $429.95 vs $489.99
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73860 minutes ago
Buy for $429.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73861 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1160
39.004707464694015%
Multi-Core
5443
27.015088346237842%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |