Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3397 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3250 - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $48.0 vs $489.99
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $489.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75506 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75505 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
17.88836583725622%
Multi-Core
1130
5.608497121302363%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |