Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 208 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $140.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-13900F - $0.83 vs $2.09 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |