Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 44% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 249 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $84.38 vs $419.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900F - $0.49 vs $1.69 per FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
28.994082840236686%
Price, $
$419.95
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3676 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
173
69.47791164658635%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$84.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $84.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
45.311355311355314%
Multi-Core
5263
30.565073465358033%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |