Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1785 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-8600 - 132 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $115.0 vs $419.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - $1.06 vs $3.18 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.18/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, $
$419.95
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
108
81.81818181818183%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Single-Core
1456
53.333333333333336%
Multi-Core
5027
29.194494453801035%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |