Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2004 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-8300 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than FX-8300 - $85.76 vs $112.02
- Up to 29% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8300 - $0.72 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10747 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |