Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-8120 - 130 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $78.02 vs $435.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-13900F - $0.72 vs $3.35 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |