Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900T is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900T
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7551P - 212 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900T - 64 vs 16 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-11900T
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
