Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2929 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 271 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $78.02 vs $615.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10900X - $0.33 vs $2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |