Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2803 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4130 - 194 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |