Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3985 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $100.0 vs $235.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700K - $0.6 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-950 - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-950 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
49%
Price, $
$235.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |