Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3872 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Fortnite than Core i7-920XM - 230 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5806 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
