Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 4851 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-13500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 74% better in Starfield than Core i7-920XM - 75 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |