Buy on Amazon
$90
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $90.0 vs $225.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10900F - $0.59 vs $1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Rust than Core i7-920 - 207 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i7 Processor i7-920 2.66GHz 8 MB LGA1366 CPU BX80601920
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6606 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6607 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
