Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $90.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11600K - $0.54 vs $0.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-920 - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6420 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
55%
Price, $
$179.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |