Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105T is 4502 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-920 - 215 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $89.99 vs $90.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i7-920 - $0.42 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $89.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |