Buy on Amazon
$180
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4602 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $180.0 vs $435.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-13900F - $0.8 vs $1.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 36% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-875K - 305 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 32 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i7-875K Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13341 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
