Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 4237 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $180.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-12900F - $1.0 vs $1.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 43% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-875K - 258 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
258
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
59%
Price, $
$432.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |