Buy on Amazon
$298.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 214 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 122 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $109.99 vs $298.95
- Up to 63% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-8700T - $0.91 vs $2.45 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700T - 16 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
