Key Differences
In short — Core i7-860 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-860 is 1084 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-860 - $22.92 vs $48.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-860 - $0.14 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1994 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1993 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |