Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1762 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 7% better in Valorant than Core i7-820QM - 727 vs 678 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-820QM - 35 vs 45 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
