Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3574 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i7-820QM - 268 vs 249 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |