Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 877 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 349 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $98.79 vs $443.02
- Up to 76% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-7820X - $0.3 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
23.62204724409449%
Price, $
$443.02
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $443.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
333
95.41547277936962%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
67.82423812898654%
Multi-Core
1975
25.162441075296215%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |