Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 801 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than Athlon 3000G - 173 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |