Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1141 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $52.46 vs $488.22
- Up to 88% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900 - $0.27 vs $2.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than Athlon 3000G - 226 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
195
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $488.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |